i am not bar examinee yet, but the five strike rule of the S.C. must be revisited, even in the U.S. where our jurisprudence where derived, there is no limit in taking the exam, i may place a hypothetical question, if the questions are written in Filipino or local dialect, in my humble opinion the sway of the pendulum will definitely alter, with the population of the country growing at 2.5 percent, legal assistance is at most needed, NCR alone constitute the most concentrated area of legal practice followed by highly urbanized cities, the S.C. if they wish to improve the legal education, must select the entrants, not the examinees in the legal profession, may the S.C. conduct a thorough review of the 5 strike rule to whom benefit does it derived?