ung peeping incident ba inquesable sa prosecutor?
2 Re: ung peeping incident ba inquesable sa prosecutor? on Tue Jan 15, 2013 7:17 pm
Which means na kung ang crimen na nacommit ng accused ay makukulong sya for atleast 4yrs, 2months and 1 day, then inquest ay kinakailangan.
Sa palagay ko hinde naman aabot sa 4yrs ang pagkakakulong kung sampaan ka ng unjust vexation. So inquest is not necessary.
Maybe for unjust vexation or acts of lasciviousness will do, depending sa appreciation ng fiscal dyan.
3 Re: ung peeping incident ba inquesable sa prosecutor? on Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:12 pm
if arrested without warrant, inquest is proper procedure.
so the answer is yes, inquest was proper for unjust vexation through peeping
[i] Visit our FB Page: BPO Employee Legal Advice
Warning and Disclaimer: I am not your lawyer; and you are not my client. With the limitations of an Internet forum, a thorough review of your concern is not possible. View my comments at YOUR OWN RISK. It is best to actually retain a lawyer for your individual concerns.
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum