Free Legal Advice Philippines

Disclaimer: This web site is designed for general information only and does not create attorney-client relationship. Persons accessing this site are encouraged to seek independent counsel for legal advice regarding their individual legal issues.

Log in

I forgot my password

You are not connected. Please login or register

ung peeping incident ba inquesable sa prosecutor?

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

invest ko to

Arresto Menor
pag nanilip ba puedeng i inquest sa prosecutor? ano po magiging kaso niya?unjust vexation po? inquesable ba ang unjust vexation?

View user profile

tsi ming choi

Reclusion Perpetua
Inquest, the counterpart of preliminary investigation in case the accused was apprehended without Warrant of arrest, as a rule is mandatory only, when the crime commited is punishable by atleast 4yrs, 2months and 1 day.

Which means na kung ang crimen na nacommit ng accused ay makukulong sya for atleast 4yrs, 2months and 1 day, then inquest ay kinakailangan.

Sa palagay ko hinde naman aabot sa 4yrs ang pagkakakulong kung sampaan ka ng unjust vexation. So inquest is not necessary.

Maybe for unjust vexation or acts of lasciviousness will do, depending sa appreciation ng fiscal dyan.

View user profile


by practice, almost all prosecutors conduct PI for all crimes and direct filing is discouraged.

if arrested without warrant, inquest is proper procedure.

so the answer is yes, inquest was proper for unjust vexation through peeping

[i] Visit our FB Page: BPO Employee Legal Advice
Warning and Disclaimer: I am not your lawyer; and you are not my client. With the limitations of an  Internet forum, a thorough review of your concern is not possible. View my comments at YOUR OWN RISK. It is best to actually retain a lawyer for your individual concerns.
View user profile

Sponsored content

View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum